Philosophy of Medicine International Reading Group

After a brief break we are resuming the Philosophy of Medicine International Reading Group! As previously, each week there will be two online meetings of the group to discuss the same section of text, one on Wednesday night at 5pm UK time, one on Thursday morning at 10 am UK time, in hopes of accommodating group members in a variety of time zones. There is no need to attend all meetings-please come when you can.

At the request of quite a few members, this term we are reading Jonathan Fuller’s The New Modern Medicine: Disease, Evidence, and Epidemiological Medicine (OUP 2026).

This text is available, open access, here: https://academic.oup.com/book/61541

Meeting times are as follows:  

1.      Wednesday Feb 11 5pm, Thursday Feb 12 10am, chapter 1 

2.      Wednesday Feb 18 5pm, Thursday Feb 19 10am, chapter 2

3.      Wednesday Feb 25 5pm, Thursday Feb 26 10am, chapter 3

4.      Wednesday March 4 5pm, Thursday March 5 10am, chapter 4

5.      Wednesday March 11 5pm, Thursday March 12 10am, chapter 5

6.      Wednesday March 28 5pm, Thursday March 19 10am, chapter 6

7.      Wednesday April 1 5pm, Thursday April 2nd 10am, chapter 7

8.      Wednesday April 8 5pm, Thursday April 9 10 am, chapter 8

9.      Wednesday April 15 5pm, Thursday April 16 10am, chapter 9

If you would like to join the group, sign up at: https://groups.google.com/g/philmed-rg/

Announcing “The New Modern Medicine” by Jonathan Fuller (2025, OUP, open access)

We are pleased to announce the publication of The New Modern Medicine by Jonathan Fuller (Oxford University Press, 2025). In this book, Fuller argues that contemporary scientific medicine has been reshaped into a “new modern medicine” by new disease patterns, new norms of evidence, and (above all) the centrality of epidemiological science to medical concepts and reasoning.

The book develops this picture through a systematic examination of what Fuller calls “epidemiological medicine”, contrasting it with the earlier model of “laboratory medicine”, and using this contrast to sharpen a set of core philosophical problems facing contemporary healthcare. In the Introduction, Fuller motivates the project by identifying seven such problems, including molecular reductionism, multifactorial aetiology, chronicity and asymptomaticity, evidence hierarchies, the meaning of medical risk, external validity of clinical trials, and biased evidence.

Across four parts—The New Modern Medicine, Disease, Evidence, and Epidemiological Medicine—the book ranges from theories of disease and classification to medical evidence and prediction, the interpretation of risk, problems of extrapolation, and therapeutic scepticism, before culminating in an extended discussion of twenty-first-century medicine and its competing self-understandings.

The New Modern Medicine is available open access – you can download a PDF from the publisher’s page. Fuller notes that this open-access availability was supported by a University of Johannesburg research associateship with CPEMPH.

Announcing a New Journal: Philosophy of Medicine

We are thrilled to announce the launch of a new academic journal, Philosophy of Medicine. The journal’s website is live for submissions at http://philmed.pitt.edu.

Philosophy of Medicine is an open-access journal that publishes exceptional original philosophical research and perspectives on all aspects of medicine, including medical research and practices. Through its public-facing section The Examination Room, it also publishes content for the wider public, including health professionals and health scientists.

The mission of Philosophy of Medicine is to serve as the flagship journal for the field by advancing research in philosophy of medicine, by engaging widely with medicine, health sciences and the public, and by providing open-access content for all.

The journal is led by Alex Broadbent as inaugural Editor-in-Chief and Jonathan Fuller as Deputy Editor in Chief (see the full editorial team here: https://philmed.pitt.edu/philmed/about/editorialTeam). It is published by the University of Pittsburgh Library System through Open Journal Systems (OJS) with generous financial support from the Center for Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh and the Faculty of Humanities at the University of Johannesburg.

Queries about the journal can be sent to phil.med@pitt.edu.

The editors of Philosophy of Medicine look forward to stewarding the journal through this exciting new phase in the development of our field.

Warmly,

Alex Broadbent and Jonathan Fuller

Co-Founding Editors

Philosophy of Medicine

Great piece from @JonathanJFuller ‘What’s Missing in Pandemic Models: Philosophy is needed to put the science of COVID-19 in perspective.’ In @NautilusMag #epitwitter

http://nautil.us/issue/84/outbreak/whats-missing-in-pandemic-models

Jonathan Fuller writes: “In the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous models are being used to predict the future. But as helpful as they are, they cannot make sense of themselves. They rely on epidemiologists and other modelers to interpret them. Trouble is, making predictions in a pandemic is also a philosophical exercise. We need to think about hypothetical worlds, causation, evidence, and the relationship between models and reality.”

Read more…

Boston Review: ‘COVID-19 has revealed a contest between two competing philosophies of scientific knowledge. To manage the crisis, we must draw on both’ says @JonathanJFuller #epitwitter

http://bostonreview.net/science-nature/jonathan-fuller-models-v-evidence

‘How do the coronavirus models generating these hypothetical curves square with the evidence? What roles do models and evidence play in a pandemic? Answering these questions requires reconciling two competing philosophies in the science of COVID-19.’ Great piece which will still be interesting a week, month, year and decade from now, unusually at present.

Relative Activity in philosepi

Having neglected this blog for several months I find myself suddenly swamped with things to write about. My book has been translated into Korean by Hyundeuk Cheon, Hwang Seung-sik, and Mr Jeon, and judging by their insightful comments and questions they have done a superb and careful job. Next week there is a workshop on Prediction in Epidemiology and Healthcare at KCL, organised by Jonathan Fuller and Luis Jose Flores, which promises to be exciting. Coming up in August is the World Congress of Epidemiology, where I’m giving two talks, hopefully different ones – one on stability for a session on translation and public engagement, and one on the definition of measures of causal strength as part of a session for the next Dictionary of Epidemiology. And I’m working on a paper on risk relativism which has been accepted by Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health subject to revisions in response to the extremely interesting comments of 5 reviewers – I think this is possibly the most rigorous and most useful review process I have encountered. Thus this is a promissory note, by which I hope to commit my conscience to writing here about risk relativism, stability and measures of causal strength in the coming weeks.